ultimentra wrote:
Those are not Russian soldiers Trent. They are Ukrainian and the ATACS was a testbed camo, not an adoption.
http://blog.predatorbdu.com/2012/10/ukr ... cs-au.htmlThis is where you got those pictures from.
Please stop saying that Russian soldiers "wear" ATACS. It makes me cringe
I like making you cringe, its almost as fun as shooting you six times in ten minutes. But you are right, Ukrainian.
But weren't Ukrainians actually Russians from Peter I to Boris Yelsin? No different than Guamanians and Puerto Ricans, or even Texans and Mexicans are Americans? Mexico Mexicans no less, are Americans in the same sense that I, or anyone else my age category would group a Ukrainian in. Ukrainians are Russian in the broad sense of the word as are Latvians, or Georgians. For that matter Northern Irish are British. Which makes me cringe, but can't be denied.
Chew this. I am willing to bet there are many more Soviet Russians from age 23+ alive in Ukraine then there are age 22- Ukrainian natural born citizens. I understand that in your entire lifetime you have never had to group any of the former SSR's into the country they once were. None of us care that there is a difference now between and Estonian, Belarussian, Tajik, or Azerbaijani. They are all Russian.
If China broke up, would people from Hunan, Guangxi, or Hainan no longer be Chinese?
Like I warned in the first post, don't hate.